Christianity 5.3, Diet: The Vegan Debate


Plant-based diets represent good, responsible Christian stewardship for all God’s Creation [and] can be a powerful and faith-strengthening witness to Christ's love, compassion, and peace. (Christian Vegetarian Association, “Our Mission,” n.p.)


Why are so many people rethinking their dietary choices? The reasons usually offered up include ​“for the animals,” ​“for the environment,” or ​“for my heath.” Yet, a rapidly growing number of people are cutting back, or indeed cutting out, animal products from their diet as part of their Christian faith. (Daryl Booth, co-founder of Sarx: For All God’s Creatures, n.p.) 


There are four common arguments against a vegan diet that Christians are likely to bring to the table:

  1. Scriptures indicate that God permitted humans to eat anymals.

  2. Scriptures indicate that God prescribed anymal sacrifice.

  3. Acts 10:9–16 teaches that we can and should eat all foods that God has given, including anymals.

  4. Jesus ate fish.


Counterpoint arguments show that, in light of scriptures and Christian ethics, these reasons for rejecting a vegan diet do not hold in contemporary times. The acronym AMORE (anymals, medical, oppressions, religion, and environment) reminds of five key reasons why Christians are called to be vegan. (See Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Reasons for Vegan.)


There is a deep connection between faith and food. (Christopher Carter, Ph.D., The Spirit of Soul Food, 10) 

Gwenna Hunter (founder of Vegans for Black Lives Matter and Vegans of LA) helps distribute vegan food (with Vegan Outreach) to Los Angeles communities affected by COVID-19. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media)

5.3 Outline

I. Genesis Diet

Point: God permits the consumption of animals for food in Genesis 9.

Counterpoints:

A. God strongly dislikes violence, which is corruption.

B. Omnivory and vegetarianism cause fear and dread.

C. God reaffirms a plant-based diet by providing manna.

D. Christianity teaches love and working for moral perfection.

Summary Point: We Must Choose.

II. Sacrifice

Point: Anymal sacrifices are acceptable as described in scriptures and are indicated as pleasing to God, so how can it be wrong to harm or kill anymals for food?

Counterpoints

  1. Many (Protestant) Christians understand Jesus to have been the ultimate and final sacrifice, replacing ritual sacrifices.

  2. Eating anymals in the 21st century is not justified by scriptural acceptance/descriptions of anymal sacrifice.

  3. God does not delight in the smell of burning bodies.

  4. Bloodletting rituals were phased out and replaced more than 2000 years ago.

  5. Anymals are not ours to give.

Summary Point: Separate Topics.

III. Acts 10:9–16 tells us that we can (and should) eat all foods that God has given, including anymals.

Point: God instructs Peter to eat animals and Paul teaches that all foods are acceptable, so it is fine to eat anymal products.

Counterpoints

  1. Acts 10:9-16 indicates a vegan diet.

  2. Romans 14 and 1 Corinthians 8 support and strengthen Acts 10.

  3. Mark 7 also supports Acts 10

Summary of Acts 10, Romans 14, 1 Corinthians 8, and Mark 7

IV. Jesus—Fishes and Fishing

Point: Jesus ate fish flesh, served fish flesh, and helped people to catch fishes, so why shouldn’t we eat fishes and other anymals?

Counterpoints:

  1. Eating fishes in the 21st century does not align with core Christian ethics.

  2. In multiplying bread and fishes, Jesus does not cause the death of even one fish.

  3. Jesus fills fishing nets in order to pull people away from fishing.

  4. In scriptures, food and eating are often metaphors, not to be taken literally.

  5. One Gospel reports that Jesus ate a piece of a fish to prove to doubting disciples that he had risen, but morally speaking, this is not a legitimate reason to choose to consume fishes.

Summary of Jesus and Fishes

V. The Swine of Gerasene/Gadarene/Girgesene

Point: If a pig’s life is valuable in the sight of God, why did Jesus allow evil spirits to enter a herd of pigs, which cost them their lives?

Counterpoints:

A: This story is not about the comparative value of life.

B. This story is not about the value of the lives of pigs.

C: The pigs’ presence is symbolic.

Summary Comment on the Swine of Gerasene

Featured Sources


(To view all Christianity topics, visit 5.1 Christianity: Introduction and Outline)

Dorota Danowska outside the vegan restaurant that she opened in 1987 in Wroclaw—one of the first of its kind in Poland—now a hub for activists and events. Dorota’s mother was also a vegan animal activist. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

I. Genesis Diet

Among Christians, the most common argument against choosing a vegan diet is that Genesis 9:3 permits humanity to consume “everything.” There are a handful of strong counterarguments that rest on a more complete understanding of scriptures, including God instructing humans to be vegan (first in Genesis and again in Numbers) and numerous descriptions of the nature of God.



Point: God permits the consumption of animals for food in Genesis 9, so there is no need to be vegan.


Genesis 9:3

Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you; and just as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.


Four Counterpoints:


Genesis indicates that the creator strongly dislikes violence/corruption, that moving from a vegan diet (no anymal products) to omnivory (diet including flesh, dairy, and eggs) or vegetarianism (includes dairy and eggs) causes fear and dread, and that we are accountable to God for anymals whom we harm or kill. Finally, scriptures state and reaffirm God’s preference for a peaceful, vegan world.


Christians share the Jewish creation story and therefore worship a God who created a vegan world, a nonviolent world in which “no creature was to feed on another.” (J. R. Hyland, Master of Theology, ordained minister with Assembly of God, God’s Covenant with Animals, 21)


Walker and Harry, rescued from the wool and flesh industries, at Edgar's Mission Sanctuary in Australia. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

1. God strongly dislikes violence, which is corruption.


Genesis 6 teaches that God brought the flood because of corruption and earthly violence. (Corruption is “a departure from the original plan or from what is pure or correct” (“Corruption” n.p.).) “Corruption” and “violence” are used interchangeably in the passage, indicating that violence is corruption (of the Creator’s peaceful planet):


Genesis 6:11-13

Now the earth was corrupt in God's sight, and the earth was filled with violence. And God saw that the earth was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon the earth. And God said to Noah, “I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence because of them; now I am going to destroy them along with the earth. Now the earth was corrupt in God’s sight, and the earth was filled with violence.”


God created a peaceful, harmonious, vegan world (Genesis 1:29) that was soon “filled with violence” (Genesis 6:11), causing the Creator to bring a great flood to destroy all that had been made (Genesis 6:17). This provides a strong indication of how much God disapproves of human violence and how important it is that humans be peaceful and live harmoniously.


Violence is an act that can “hurt, damage, or kill someone or something” and can be physical or mental, intentional or unintentional (“Violence” n.p.). Nearly everything that happens to anymals in the dairy, egg, and meat industries constitutes physical or mental harm/violence and invariably culminates in premature death. The violence of omnivory (eating flesh, dairy, and eggs) and vegetarianism (eating dairy and eggs) not only harms anymals, but also humanity and the planet. This is contrary to what scriptures indicate that the Creator intended for humanity and what God prefers. (For more on these harms, see the book “Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Critical Reasons to Choose Vegan.”)


We are to help end all forms of human caused pain, suffering, bloodshed, and death here on earth . . . which mandates that we eat only plant foods. (Frank Hoffman, minister, founder of All-Creatures.org, n.p.)

Hen rescued hen from the egg industry, waiting to be re-homed, with Lina Lind Christensen at Frie Vinger (Free Wings), Denmark. (Image courtesy of We Animals Media.)

2. Omnivory and vegetarianism cause fear and dread.


After granting “everything” as food, the language and tone of Genesis 9:3 reveal Divine displeasure, indicating that dairy, eggs, and meat are not what the Creator intended living beings to eat:


Genesis 9:2

The fear and dread of you shall rest on every animal of the earth, and on every bird of the air, on everything that creeps on the ground, and on all the fish of the sea; into your hand they are delivered.


God’s permission to exploit anymals for food in Genesis 9:3 marks “the end of the golden age . . . in which men lived in harmony with the beasts” (Interpreter’s 1:549). The language and tone remind that dairy, eggs, and flesh are not what God intended living creatures to eat. Rav Kook, the first chief rabbi of pre-state Israel (and “one of the most important Jewish thinkers of all time” (“Rabbi Abraham” n.p.)) recognized “a plant-based diet as the biblical ideal” (Schwartz, Vegan, xv). He noted “that the consumption of animal products was a tempo­rary concession” and that “the ideal society, the Messianic age,” is one where “compassion is manifest” (Schwartz, Vegan, xv). For Christians, a vegan diet stands as “evidence of a total transformation—a conversion away from the values of this world and toward the world as God originally created it and will one day create it anew” (Webb 25). (For more on these harms, see the book “Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Critical Reasons to Choose Vegan.”)


At Christmastime people recreate images that depict Jesus as a newborn babe lying in a barnyard manger (feed bin), surrounded by farmed anymals, where he rests safely on his first night. Though he was lying in their feed bin, the anymals did not mistake Jesus for food. Neither should we mistake them for food (Kemmerer, In Search of Consistency, 270).

“The Divine Manger.” (Courtesy of Crista Forest.)

3. God reaffirms a plant-based diet by providing manna.

Exodus and Nehemiah reaffirm Genesis 1: God provides nothing more than plants and plant products for our sustenance:


Exodus 16:13-16

When the layer of dew lifted, there on the surface of the wilderness was a fine flaky substance, as fine as frost on the ground. When the Israelites saw it, they said to one another, “What is it?” For they did not know what it was. Moses said to them, “It is the bread that the Lord has given you to eat. This is what the Lord has commanded: ‘Gather as much of it as each of you needs, an omer [measuring volume] to a person according to the number of persons, all providing for those in their own tents.’”


Nehemiah 9:15

For their hunger you gave them bread from heaven, and for their thirst you brought water for them out of the rock.


Manna (without flesh, dairy, or eggs) provided by God is of such importance that Moses instructs people to preserve and remember this food in Exodus 16:31-36.


Exodus 16:31-36

The house of Israel called it manna; it was like coriander seed, white, and the taste of it was like wafers made with honey. Moses said, “This is what the Lord has commanded: ‘Let an omer of it be kept throughout your generations, in order that they may see the food with which I fed you in the wilderness, when I brought you out of the land of Egypt.’” And Moses said to Aaron, “Take a jar, and put an omer of manna in it, and place it before the Lord, to be kept throughout your generations.” As the Lord commanded Moses, so Aaron placed it before the covenant, for safekeeping. The Israelites ate manna forty years, until they came to a habitable land; they ate manna, until they came to the border of the land of Canaan.


(For more on vegan diet provided in Genesis 1, see 5.4.II.A.4 “Vegan Dominion.”).


Nonetheless, some of the lost wanderers were unhappy with manna and missed familiar foods of home. Numbers tells us that this angered God:


Numbers 11:4-6

The rabble among them had a strong craving; and the Israelites also wept again, and said, “If only we had meat to eat! We remember the fish we used to eat in Egypt for nothing, the cucumbers, the melons, the leeks, the onions, and the garlic; but now our strength is dried up, and there is nothing at all but this manna to look at.”


Those who are discontent with God’s vegan provisions are among the nonfaithful and are referred to as “rabble.” In the following paragraphs they complain loudly for “meat.” Finally the Lord provides meat in abundance (Num. 11:31-33), but


while the meat was still between their teeth, before it was consumed, the anger of the Lord was kindled against the people, and the Lord struck the people with a very great plague. So that place was called Kibroth-hattaavah, because there they buried the people who had the craving. (Num. 11: 33-34)


God was angry that the people could not be contented without eating anymal products, so angry that he brought a plague against them, leaving behind the “graveyard of lust” (Kibroth-hattaavah). Plant-based manna, provided by God, is another indication (and reminder) of what the Creator intends/prefers for our sustenance, of God’s preference that we share the planet in a state of peace and harmony, and that we be contented with what the Creator provided at the outset.


God’s love for all of creation confers intrinsic value to all of God’s creatures and creations. It is this fundamental measure of worth which serves as the foundation of justice. Christians are called by God to love what God loves, to value what God values, and to join with God in the process of redemption—to restore the right relationships of a good creation in a fallen world. (James B. Martin-Schramm, ordained, Evangelical, “Incentives,” 440)

Paul McCartney and PETA with an Easter message. (Image courtesy of PETA)

4. Christianity teaches love and working for moral perfection


The core ethic of Christianity is love. One way to show our love for God is to follow the teachings of the faith (John 14:23). This means that to love God is to protect and care for creation and live a life of compassion, kindness, generosity, and self-sacrificing service, especially when dealing with those who fall under our power. (For more on love in Christianity, see 5.3.I.B.1 “Love.”)


The core ethic of Christianity is love. One way to show our love for God is to follow the teachings of the faith (John 14:23). This means that to love God is to protect and care for creation and live a life of compassion, kindness, generosity, and self-sacrificing service, especially when dealing with those who fall under our power. (For more on these harms, see the book “Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Critical Reasons to Choose Vegan.”)


Many Christians relate that, since animals eat each other, there should be nothing wrong with humans eating animals. . . . Christians are not called to follow the law of the jungle (where "might makes right"), but to follow Christ—to be compassionate, merciful, and respectful of God's Creation. (Stephen Kaufman, M.D., “Christianity and Animals,” n.p.)


By far the most important duty of all Christians in the cause of animal welfare is to cultivate this capacity to see things with the heart of God, and so to suffer with other creatures. Most people on this subject have lost or never developed the power to see. Perhaps as children they had it, but it has been educated out of them. Now, like the Israelites condemned by Isaiah, they look but never perceive, they hear but never understand. They can never be rescued unless by people who do see, and who can therefore with God’s help open their eyes.” (Rt. Rev. Dr. John Austin Baker, “Speech,” 43)

Greeting one of the residents at Freedom Farm, a vegan sanctuary in Moshav Olesh, Israel. (Photo courtesy of Nir Elias/Reuters and Pacific Roots Magazine)


Summary, Genesis Diet


Scriptures teach that humans may eat anymal products but:

  • At the outset, God prescribed a vegan diet for all living beings.

  • Eating anymal products is corruption, a departure from the original and preferred diet.

  • Eating anymal products is violence and God disapproves of human violence.

  • Omnivory (eating flesh, dairy, and eggs) and vegetarianism (eating dairy and eggs) create fear and dread.

  • Anymals and all life belong exclusively to God.

  • God provides a vegan diet (manna) when the Israelites are lost in the desert and Moses tells people to commemorate and remember vegan manna provided by God.

  • Christian ethics call for love and ask that we strive for moral perfection.


Though humans are permitted to eat flesh, dairy, and eggs, scriptures show clearly that living vegan is preferable Therefore, this choice shows respect for God and God’s creation. The teachings are clear. The choice is ours.


My faith in Jesus has influenced my decision to stop eating animals. (Gaby at “Testimonies: Christians Speak Up for Animals,” n.p.)



II. Sacrifice


Christians sometimes argue that, inasmuch as scriptures accept anymal sacrifice, there is no need to be vegan. There are a number of counterpoints to this assertion, including the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus, a disconnect between ritual sacrifice and the dinner table, and the history of sacrifice more generally.


Point: Animal sacrifice is described in scriptures and is indicated as pleasing to God, so how can it be wrong to harm and kill anymals for food?


Gen. 8:20-21

Then Noah built an altar to the Lord, and took of every clean animal and of every clean bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. And when the Lord smelled the pleasing odor, the Lord said in his heart, “I will never again curse the ground because of humankind, for the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth; nor will I ever again destroy every living creature as I have done.


Exodus 10:25-26

Moses said, “You must also let us have sacrifices and burnt offerings to sacrifice to the Lord our God. Our livestock also must go with us; not a hoof shall be left behind, for we must choose some of them for the worship of the Lord our God.”


Exodus 34:25

You shall not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven.


Leviticus 1:1-17

When any of you bring an offering of livestock to the Lord, you shall bring your offering from the herd or from the flock.

If the offering is a burnt offering from the herd, you shall offer a male without blemish; you shall bring it to the entrance of the tent of meeting, for acceptance in your behalf before the Lord. You shall lay your hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it shall be acceptable in your behalf as atonement for you. The bull shall be slaughtered before the Lord; and Aaron's sons the priests shall offer the blood, dashing the blood against all sides of the altar that is at the entrance of the tent of meeting. The burnt offering shall be flayed and cut up into its parts. The sons of the priest Aaron shall put fire on the altar and arrange wood on the fire. Aaron's sons the priests shall arrange the parts, with the head and the suet, on the wood that is on the fire on the altar; but its entrails and its legs shall be washed with water. Then the priest shall turn the whole into smoke on the altar as a burnt offering, an offering by fire of pleasing odor to the Lord.

If your gift for a burnt offering is from the flock, from the sheep or goats, your offering shall be a male without blemish. . . .

If your offering to the Lord is a burnt offering of birds, you shall choose your offering from turtledoves or pigeons. . . .


Leviticus 22:26-30

The Lord spoke to Moses, saying: When an ox or a sheep or a goat is born, it shall remain seven days with its mother, and from the eighth day on it shall be acceptable as the Lord's offering by fire. But you shall not slaughter, from the herd or the flock, an animal with its young on the same day. When you sacrifice a thanksgiving offering to the Lord, you shall sacrifice it so that it may be acceptable in your behalf. It shall be eaten on the same day; you shall not leave any of it until morning.


Luke 2:22-24

When the time came for their purification according to the law of Moses, they . . . offered a sacrifice according to what is stated in the law of the Lord, “a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons.”


Five Counterpoints:


Some assert that the presence and acceptance of ritual anymal sacrifice in the Hebrew Bible justifies contemporary omnivory and vegetarianism, but this conclusion makes no sense. Moreover, a closer look at scriptures in the historic context speaks against anymal sacrifice altogether.

Rescued lamb. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

Jesus was the ultimate and final sacrifice, replacing ritual sacrifices.


“He has appeared once for all at the end of the age to remove sin by the sacrifice of himself.” (Hebrews 9:24-26)


Hebrews 10:6-10

[W]hen Christ came into the world, he said,

“Sacrifices and offerings you have not desired,

but a body you have prepared for me;

in burnt offerings and sin offerings

you have taken no pleasure.

Then I said, ‘See, God, I have come to do your will, O God’ . . .

When he said above, “You have neither desired nor taken pleasure in

sacrifices and offerings and burnt offerings and sin offerings” . . . he added, “See, I have come to do your will.” He abolishes the first in order to establish the second. And it is by God's will that we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.


The crucifixion of Jesus put an end to any need for ritual sacrifice: Jesus was “the final sacrifice” (Larm n.p.), the supreme offering. “His sinless life paid the terrible cost of all of mankind’s sins for all time” (“Ultimate Sacrifice” n.p.). The crucifixion of Jesus finally and completely replaced ritual sacrifices, rendering anymal sacrifices pointless and wrong-headed. In light of crucifixion of Jesus, the sacrificing of anymals is a denial of the sacrifice of Jesus. Christianity no longer maintains rituals of sacrifice because of the Lord’s “onetime offering effective forever” so that sacrifices are denial of faith in Jesus as God and savior (Larm n.p.).


No one has greater love than this, to lay down one's life for one's friends.” (John 15:13)

Bartolomé Estebán Murillo, “The Crucifixion” (ca. 1675). (Image courtesy of The Metropolitan Museum of Art.)

John 15:13

“No one has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.”


2. Eating anymals in the 21st century cannot be justified by scriptural descriptions of anymal sacrifice.


Ritual sacrifices described in scriptures have nothing to do with the ethics of diet in the 21st century and therefore cannot legitimately be used as a moral or religious argument in favor of eating flesh, dairy, or eggs in contemporary times. Most obviously, the eating of flesh, dairy, and eggs at the dinner table does not qualify as a ritual sacrifice. Moreover, contemporary complications of anymal agriculture (suffering, threats to humanity, and environmental degradation) speak against omnivory and vegetarianism. (For more on these harms, see the book “Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Critical Reasons to Choose Vegan.”)

In condoning empty rituals and standing silent in the face of immoral deeds, we make a mockery of Judaism. (Nina Natelson, founder and director of Concern for Helping Animals in Israel (CHAI) and Hakol CHAI, in Schwartz, Vegan, n.p.)


It is not reasonable (or common) to read Genesis 8:21 literally, to believe that the smell of burning flesh pleased the nose of God, as if God has a physical nose and a sense of smell akin to that of animals (“What Does Genesis” n.p.). Moreover, divine pleasure in a dead and roasted body is inconsistent with scriptures that tell of God creating a vegan world, of God’s mercy and compassion, and of a God who is invested in the life and wellbeing of every living creature.


It is, however, reasonable to understand the Creator’s pleasure (described for both flesh and grain sacrifices) as stemming from the human act of remembering God and giving thanks: The Creator finds the smell of flesh pleasing not because God has a nose and finds the smell of burning bodies pleasing, but because the Creator knows that “the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth” (Genesis 8:21), and yet Noah has remembered God and given thanks. Would not the Creator be even more pleased if, rather than destroy life, humanity gave thanks to God by doing what we have been commanded to do in Genesis 2—caretaking creation as God would do?

In Spain, rescuers take delight in the young lives they hold—lambs rescued through Animal Equality. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

3. God does not delight in the smell of burning bodies.


It is not reasonable (or common) to read Genesis 8:21 literally, to believe that the smell of burning flesh pleased the nose of God, as if God has a physical nose and a sense of smell akin to that of animals (“What Does Genesis” n.p.). Moreover, divine pleasure in a dead and roasted body is inconsistent with scriptures that tell of God creating a vegan world, of God’s mercy and compassion, and of a God who is invested in the life and wellbeing of every living creature.


It is, however, reasonable to understand the Creator’s pleasure (described for both flesh and grain sacrifices) as stemming from the human act of remembering God and giving thanks: The Creator finds the smell of flesh pleasing not because God has a nose and finds the smell of burning bodies pleasing, but because the Creator knows that “the inclination of the human heart is evil from youth” (Genesis 8:21), and yet Noah has remembered God and given thanks. Would not the Creator be even more pleased if, rather than destroy life, humanity gave thanks to God by doing what we have been commanded to do in Genesis 2—caretaking creation as God would do?


4. Bloodletting rituals were phased out and replaced more than 2000 years ago.


Go and learn what this means, “I desire mercy, not sacrifice.” (Mathew 9:13 and 12:7)


In many parts of the ancient world, blood offerings were common and even “human sacrifice appears to have been widespread,” including bloodletting, drowning, strangling, burning, and casting over cliffs and into volcanoes. Over time, these bloody practices were replaced with offering of “effigies made of dough, wood, or other materials” (“Theories of the Origin” n.p.). Scriptures record this shift, and the first step was anymals replacing human beings for blood-letting rituals in Genesis 22:1-14:


Genesis 22:1-14

After these things God tested Abraham. He said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” He said, “Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains. . . .”

When they came to the place that God had shown him, Abraham built an altar there and laid the wood in order. He bound his son Isaac, and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. Then Abraham reached out his hand and took the knife to kill his son. But the angel of the Lord called to him from heaven, and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” He said, “Do not lay your hand on the boy or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.” And Abraham looked up and saw a ram, caught in a thicket by its horns. Abraham went and took the ram and offered it up as a burnt offering instead of his son.


Two important details emerge:

  • We are all living creatures and anymals are close/similar enough to humanity to provide a bodily replacement for sacrifice purposes and

  • God does not prescribe killing the ram.[clxi]


This information indicates that, inasmuch as we no longer sacrifice humans to God, we should no longer sacrifice anymals to God.


Descriptions of anymal sacrifice in Leviticus 1 are followed by descriptions of grain offerings in Leviticus 2. Next, scriptures reveal a shift to internal sacrifice, submitting to religious laws and ethics (more than 2000 years ago). While scriptures make clear how blood sacrifice rituals were performed, the latter prophets show a definite preference for other forms of supplicating, thanking, and remembering God. They emphasize right action rather than sacrifice:


Proverbs 21:3

To do righteousness and justice is more acceptable to the Lord than sacrifice.


Isaiah 1:11-17

What to me is the multitude of your sacrifices?

says the Lord;

I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams

and the fat of fed beasts;

I do not delight in the blood of bulls,

or of lambs, or of goats.

When you come to appear before me,

who asked this from your hand?

Trample my courts no more;

bringing offerings is futile; . . .


When you stretch out your hands,

I will hide my eyes from you;

even though you make many prayers,

I will not listen;

your hands are full of blood.

Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean;

remove the evil of your doings

from before my eyes;

cease to do evil,

learn to do good;

seek justice,

rescue the oppressed,

defend the orphan,

plead for the widow.


Amos 5:21-25

Even though you offer me your burnt offerings and grain offerings,

I will not accept them;

and the offerings of well-being of your fatted animals

I will not look upon. . .

But let justice roll down like waters,

and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.


Micah 6:6-8

“With what shall I come before the Lord,

and bow myself before God on high?

Shall I come before him with burnt offerings,

with calves a year old?

Will the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams,

with ten thousands of rivers of oil?

Shall I give my firstborn for my transgression,

the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?”

He has told you, O mortal, what is good;

and what does the Lord require of you

but to do justice, and to love kindness,

and to walk humbly with your God?

Pam Ahern with rescued sheep at Edgar's Mission Sanctuary in Lancefield, Australia. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

Bloodless remembrances of God align with the original Divine intent for a peaceful world as described in Genesis, a world where anymals and humans work together to tend and protect the Creator’s creation, while also fulfilling the scriptural expectation to work toward the coming Peaceable Kingdom (Isaiah 11, Hosea 2). (For a nonviolent reading of Hebrews (and Revelation) see in references, “A Nonviolent Reading.”) Bloodless remembrances of God are also in line with the teachings of the latter prophets. Justice does not admit of exploitation, goodness does not permit cruelty, and walking humbly with God does not allow a human-centered approach to creation: We are not entitled to use anymals as food production units, petri dishes, or clothing on the hoof. Our duty is to serve and protect all that is God’s on behalf of God.


It is not possible to pose a viable defense for the contemporary exploitation of anymals as food by pointing to the religious ritual of anymal sacrifice that scriptures tell us were only one form of ritual sacrifice, and at that, a form replaced more than 2000 years ago.


What does a highly ethical religion have to do with the collection of blood in vessels and the burning of animal limbs on an altar? (Nathan Lopes Cardozo, Orthodox rabbi in Jerusalem, in Schwartz, Vegan, 7)


We believe that, within contemporary Western culture, the adoption of a vegan lifestyle is a faithful Christian witness of God’s peaceable intentions for all creatures and His promised kingdom-to-come. (Sarx: For All God’s Creatures, n.p.)


5. Anymals are not ours to give.


Scriptures note that it is redundant to offer life to God:


Psalms 50:9–11

I will not accept a bull from your house, or goats from your folds. For every wild animal of the forest is mine, the cattle on a thousand hills. I know all the birds of the air, and all that moves in this field is mine.


Neither sacrifice nor the willful consumption of flesh, dairy, and eggs are supported by scriptures, especially in contemporary times. However, tending God’s creatures (as we are instructed to do in Genesis 2) is an appropriate expression of obedience and devotion to the Creator. (For more on what God instructs humans to do, see 5.3.II.A.6 “Duties assigned by God”)


My faith influenced my love of animals because they are God’s creation. Humans are meant to look after and care for all of God’s creations, not shove them onto factory farms or abuse them. (Gaby, “Testimonies: Christians Speak Up for Animals,” n.p.)


Summary, Sacrifice


Ritual sacrifice in Biblical times is a completely separate topic from the ethics of eating anymal products in the 21st century, and the former therefore does not and cannot justify the latter. Many (if not almost all) Christians understand that “the blood of bulls and goats does not take away sins” and “God does not desire sacrifice” in the form of bloodletting” (Larm n.p.). Jesus made the ultimate sacrifice, rendering ritual sacrifice obsolete. We are to give of ourselves. We are to sacrifice our willful desires in order to live a Christian life. Any argument attempting to use ancient ritual anymal sacrifice to defend contemporary omnivory/vegetarianism is likely indicates a lack of sincere commitment to Christian ethics.



III. Acts 10:9-16 and Mark 7:14-21 (Supported by Romans and 1 Corinthians)

(This section of the book is the original work of Dr. Kemmerer.)


Christians sometimes state that Acts 10 and Mark 7 teach that we can (and should) eat all foods that God has given, including anymals. But in contemporary times, supported by writings in Romans and 1 Corinthians, this passage calls for a vegan diet.


Point: God instructs Peter to eat animals and Paul teaches that all foods are acceptable, so it is acceptable to eat anymal products.


Acts 10:9–16

About noon the next day, as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray. He became hungry and wanted something to eat; and while it was being prepared, he fell into a trance. He saw the heaven opened and something like a large sheet coming down, being lowered to the ground by its four corners. In it were all kinds of four-footed creatures and reptiles and birds of the air. Then he heard a voice saying, “Get up, Peter; kill and eat.” But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is profane or unclean.” The voice said to him again, a second time, “What God has made clean, you must not call profane.” This happened three times, and the thing was suddenly taken up to heaven.


Domenico Fetti, “Peter's Vision of a Sheet with Animals.” (Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.)

Mark 7:14-21

Then he called the crowd again and said to them, “Listen to me, all of you, and understand: there is nothing outside a person that by going in can defile, but the things that come out are what defile.”

When he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about the parable. He said to them, “Then do you also fail to understand? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile, since it enters, not the heart but the stomach, and goes out into the sewer?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) And he said, “It is what comes out of a person that defiles. For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come.


Three Counterpoints:

Acts 10, taken at the surface level, might lead readers to believe that eating anymals is not only permissible but an important act. A broader and closer read indicates a vegan diet.


  1. Acts 10:9-16 indicates a vegan diet.


Dietary differences have long been defining characteristics for humanity, critical to membership and group identity. There are at least three important reasons for this religious focus on food restrictions, which generally lean strongly against anymal products:


  • discipline—abstinence is viewed as part of a holy life;

  • purity and morality—bloodshed and violence, especially against the comparatively helpless (anymals), is discouraged in all religions;

  • ideals—for both of the above reasons, in many religious traditions a vegan diet is portrayed as ideal.


A number of religious orders have been set apart by food choice at least since the sixth and fifth centuries BCE, including Jews and Christians. Jewish food restrictions separated “the Jewish community in values and practices” (Schnall 416). “[P]riestly dietary laws, adapted by the Jews after Exile, contributed tremendously to the exclusive nature of the Jewish religion” (Broadman 10:67). and their meticulous dietary laws were “a mainstay of Jewish ritual,” for which some were martyred (Schnall 416). (For example, Leviticus 11:4–30 forbids eating pigs, rabbits, shellfishes, camels, vultures, geckos, weasels, and bats; locust, katydids, and grasshoppers are permissible.) For a Jew in Peter’s time, “eating pagan food was an abomination, but to dine in the house of a pagan was much worse” (Broadman 10:67).


Early Christians such as the Essenes, also adopted food restrictions, as did later denominations such as the Seventh Day Adventists (19th century), who are largely vegetarian or vegan (“At the Root” n.p.). Jewish division between clean and unclean foods, however, had no meaning in the new religion, which centered on faith in Jesus, so diet quickly became a point of contention and separation between Christians and Jews: “Religiously observant Jews would have nothing to do with Gentiles . . . [who] were considered ‘unclean’ and Jews would not associate with them” (“Questions” n.p.). But the Apostles were tasked with making “disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:18-20) and bringing the “gospel to everyone” (“Questions” n.p.). While Peter was in the habit of keeping “his distance from Gentiles” (“Acts 10” n.p.), how could he minister to people if he was unwilling to share “table fellowship in their households” (“Acts 10” n.p.)? (Ultimately, Christianity was destined to become a religion for all, which required removing “layers of ethnic prejudices” that divided individuals and communities (“Acts 10” n.p.).)


The importance and “meaning of the vision” of Acts 10 is “made clear” by the end of the story. Peter refused to eat at certain tables that were serving meats “because in such a collection of creatures, many were unclean and taboo for a Jew” (Broadman 10:67). But in this case Peter received gentiles as guests and as a consequence the guests received the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:44) (“Questions” n.p.). Peter learns from this that God has not rejected non-Jews and that he has a “responsibility to baptize Gentiles” (“Questions” n.p.).

Peter preaches to Jews and Gentiles. (Image courtesy of ClipArt Etc.)

News of this radical change traveled swiftly. Some “expressed their objection that he had not just associated with, but had actually eaten with uncircumcised Gentiles—who, under Jewish law were considered ‘unclean’” (“Questions” n.p.) Replies to these criticisms reveal the importance of Peter’s vision: His “vision did not reveal that unclean meats could now be eaten; his vision revealed that the Gentiles—previously considered ‘unclean’ by the Jews—were now being granted salvation by the God of Israel” (“Questions” n.p.). In this narrative, Jewish food laws are “abrogated explicitly as they had been implicitly” (Mark 7:14) (Guthrie 985).


Theologians/Scholars widely agree that Acts 10 speaks to “breaking down prejudicial barriers,” instructing Christians not to “make a distinction” that prevents spreading the Good News of Jesus and salvation. The message of Acts 10:9-6 is that Peter was to stop maintaining the dietary wall (created by clean and unclean foods) between himself and those whom he might otherwise teach of the Good News, and this is the “focal point” of the passages that tell of Peter’s vision (“Acts 10” n.p.).


With this information in hand, it is easy to see that the message of Peter’s vision is not to kill and eat living creatures, but to remove barriers that might block the spreading of the Gospel, to reject barriers that might exclude people from the church, the community, and Christian salvation. Acts 10:9–16 warns “against the tendency to separate things and call some of them sacred and some secular” when the important “division is between . . . that which is centered upon God and that which is not” (Interpreter’s 9:136–37). God’s message in Peter’s vision is not to encourage bloodshed but to open the doors of the Christian faith to all people of all places at all times. In the process, Acts 10 indicates that it is permissible (though not desirable) for people to eat flesh, as indicated in Genesis 9.


All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are beneficial. (1 Corinthians 6:12)


Peter’s vision speaks against dietary practices that cause division or exclusion (Kemmerer, In Search of Consistency, 261). In contemporary times, Acts 10:9-16 provides much to ponder. Is the church a place where vegans feel accepted? Where they can join in the abundance of delicious, nutritious foods at a church potlucks and pancake breakfasts?


Vegans (largely young people) have been leaving churches for decades because they feel alienated by overtly non-vegan church leaders and congregations, because foods at social functions are laced with dairy, eggs, and flesh, whether the after-service cookie and coffee socials, Sunday afternoon barbeques, or ice-cream socials, and because sermons, week after week, ignore the sufferings of anymals, the many ill-effects of consuming anymal products, and the Christian moral imperative requiring those who have access to plant-based meals to change what they eat (Kemmerer, In Search of Consistency, 261).


There is nothing in scriptures that speak against choosing vegan and there is much in Christian ethics and teachings that point clearly to a vegan diet in contemporary times. At a minimum, why not make churches vegan friendly? Or better yet, why not serve only foods that speak to peace and compassion? (For more on these harms, see the book “Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Critical Reasons to Choose Vegan.”)

The eye of a rescued steer. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

Everyone has to decide whether or not they are willing to participate in the cruelty and violence required to bring animals to their plate. I will not cast a blind eye to the suffering of ANY of God’s creatures, be they human, animal, or otherwise. To me, killing animals for human use is wrong. It is a sin. (Michele, “Testimonies: Christians Speak Up for Animals,” n.p.)


2. Romans 14 and 1 Corinthians 8 provide critical information on diet as relates to Acts 10 and Mark 7.


Romans 14:15–21

If your brother or sister is being injured by what you eat, you are no longer walking in love. Do not let what you eat cause the ruin of one for whom Christ died. . . . For the kingdom of God is not food and drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. . . . Let us then pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding. Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God. Everything is indeed clean, but it is wrong for you to make others fall by what you eat; it is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that makes your brother or sister stumble.


1 Corinthians 8:8-13

“Food will not bring us close to God.” We are no worse off if we do not eat, and no better off if we do. But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak. For if others see you, who possess knowledge, eating in the temple of an idol, might they not, since their conscience is weak, be encouraged to the point of eating food sacrificed to idols? So by your knowledge those weak believers for whom Christ died are destroyed. But when you thus sin against members of your family, and wound their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. Therefore, if food is a cause of their falling, I will never eat meat, so that I may not cause one of them to fall.


In Biblical times, flesh that was sold in the markets had generally been offered to idols beforehand (Abingdon 1182). Some Christians were concerned about eating food that had been “offered to idols” (1 Corinthians 8:4), which prevented Christians from sharing meals with non-Christians, which prevented spreading the Good News around the table.


As noted (Acts 10:9-16, above), Christians were to be mindful of dietary choices that might prevent spreading the Good News, and social life almost always involves the sharing of food. Consequently, Jewish food laws were “abrogated explicitly as they had been implicitly” in the Gospels (Mark 7:14) (Guthrie 985).


Paul speaks to the growing concern over divisions and exclusions caused by dietary laws in Romans 14 and 1 Corinthians 8 (Petruzzello, “St. Paul’s,” n.p.). He instructs Christians not to make choices that are likely to alienate people from joining the church or cause people to veer away from faith in Jesus. He instructs Christians to adjust their eating habits accordingly (Abingdon 1182). Toward this end, certain foods are to be avoided not because they are forbidden (they are not) but because they might turn people away. Paul is clear: Those whose diet causes others to fall away from Christianity “destroy the work of God” (Romans 14:20).


The letters of Paul teach that Christian love requires that food choices invite people in and not drive people out of the fold. Today, many vegans find their church unfriendly to those who choose a vegan lifestyle, and so they leave their church (Kemmerer, In Search of Consistency, 263). This leads to a different read of Paul’s writings. “How Christians relate to the rest of the world is determined, in part, by how they eat” (Webb 144). Today, those who serve anymal products in community “sin against . . . family,” and in so doing, “sin against Christ” (1 Corinthians 8:12). To serve anymal products is to “destroy the work of God” (Romans 14:20) both literally (killing anymals and wrecking the earth) and figuratively (preventing the spreading of the Word of God to vegans). In communities where vegans feel excluded Romans 14, 1 Corinthians 8, and Acts 10 speak to a vegan diet and a vegan life (Kemmerer, In Search of Consistency, 264).


At the start of summer, a hog roast was planned for a church social event. I was a regular server at church events but I explained to the pastor that I didn’t feel comfort serving at a hog roast. I did however say I would help serve a vegan option if it was made available. The pastor was furious and told me ‘Jesus has made everything clean. If you want to forbid yourself from eating pork, become a Muslim.’” (Vegan Christian in Manchester, from Sarx, “Be Not Afraid,” n.p.)


3. Mark 7 also supports Acts 10


Mark 7: 18-21

Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile, since it enters, not the heart but the stomach, and goes out into the sewer?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) And he said, “It is what comes out of a person that defiles. For it is from within, from the human heart, that evil intentions come.


Indeed, hands, teeth, and stomachs are not the problem—the problem is our hearts. To know of the sufferings and destruction caused by flesh, dairy, and eggs and to know that vegans feel alienated in omnivorous churches, and yet to nonetheless carry on as if no vegans were present, reveals a problem of caring, a noticeable lack of compassion and neighborliness. In excluding vegans from fellowship, churches also miss an opportunity to take a stand against misery, death, and indifference toward God’s creatures. Christians who exclude vegans simultaneously throw peace, redemption, and inclusivity to the wind. It is not merely meat, flesh, and dairy that reveal a lack of fidelity to core Christian ethics and values, but rather the hard-heartedness that allows someone to continue this diet despite readily-available alternative options and despite knowledge of the sufferings, deaths, damage, and alienation these foods cause. (For more on these harms, see the book “Vegan Ethics: AMORE—Five Critical Reasons to Choose Vegan.”)

Two rescued hens. (Photo courtesy of We Animals Media.)

The tender care a hen displays for her chicks, so inspired Jesus, that He used it to illustrate the depths of divine love. Yet how do we treat chickens today? In the contemporary intensive egg industry male chicks are economically worthless. As a result, each week, millions of male birds are separated from the females, placed onto a conveyer belt, and dropped alive into an industrial macerator. (Daryl Booth, co-founder of Sarx: For All God’s Creatures, n.p.) 


Summary, Acts 10:9-16 and Mark 7:14-21


Gatherings that include meat, diary, and eggs can be a stumbling block for a growing population of Christian vegans, who are most often part of a shrinking young generation of churchgoers. Scriptures instruct Christians to avoid foods that are contentious so as to avoid turning people away from Christ. The foods themselves are not unclean and cannot defile us, but our hearts (which drive our choices) most certainly can. While vegans are likely to be morally repulsed by flesh, dairy, and eggs, omnivores and vegetarians can and do choose to eat (and certainly enjoy) many vegan foods (from green beans to potatoes, from pasta to cucumbers, from bagels to alternative milks). These foods are inclusive—anyone can eat them—so these are the foods that ought to be served at church gatherings if churches want to be inclusive, and as is clear from the rest of this book, ethical. Acts 10, Romans 14, 1 Corinthians 8, and Mark 7 teach Christians to say what is written in 1 Corinthians 8:13: “if food is a cause of their falling, I will never eat meat so that I may not cause one of them to fall.” In almost all contemporary communities, dairy and eggs must be mentioned along with “meat.” A welcoming church is a vegan church.


As a vegan Christian, I spent ten or so years feeling like I was a pretty big freak.

At church, I was the only vegan. In the animal protection world, I was one of only a tiny handful of Christians. I was constantly on guard, defending one or the other . . . .

It’s so hard, so many people don’t “get” us. It’s so tempting to leave, to disengage from this tradition and these communities who have failed again and again to see us and love us well. (Sarah Withrow King, Master of Theological Studies from Palmer Theological Seminary, co-founder of CreatureKind, “The Miraculous Catch,” n.p.)


Every time I attended my small group the issue of veganism was raised and I was teased. I never once raised the issue, it was always the meat eaters who wanted to provoke and make jokes. It was like being back on a school playground.” (Vegan Christian in London, Sarx, “Be Not Afraid,” n.p.)


It can be really difficult being a Christian animal rights activist in a non-vegan world. When you hear fellow Christians using the Bible to justify the torture and harm [that] animals needlessly experience every day, it can leave your faith shaken. (Matthew King, I Will Abolish the Bow, 105)


Change is vital to ensuring the ongoing relevance of the Christian voice within a wider society which is becoming ever more concerned about the way we treat animals. So what practical steps can clergy and members of Christian communities take in making churches a welcoming place for vegans?

Our vegan vicars came up with a long list of action points including ensuring there is always provision for vegans at church functions, avoiding attractions such as hog roasts during summer fairs, providing vegan wine for communion services, holding an annual St Francis Day/Animal Blessing service, welcoming local vegan groups to use their spaces for potluck suppers, running a vegan stall at a church fȇte and including animals within prayers and preaching. (Sarx, “Be Not Afraid,” n.p.)